Search

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

When we stop pretending to pretend the Attitude Era wasn't great?

  1. Boards
  2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
  3. When we stop pretending to pretend the Attitude Era wasn't great?
Fenrir-Juubi 2 weeks ago#1
We had great tag teams having great matches, Stone Cold and The Rock cutting legendary promos almost every week, Kurt Angle with hair, Undertaker not making weird grunts at the end of a promo and kicking ass all around, Kane and The Big Show being monsters and not the punchlines of a joke, and then there was Triple H and the women. That part of the show just sucked.
The fastest way to hate more people is to go to a pro-abortion zone.
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#2
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
KnivesCore714 1 week ago#3
snoochtonooch posted...
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many


Yeah but TLC was still sick 

Too Cool was also a good team
He now exists in the darkness of deletion. Brother Nero is only a vessel of flesh that is empty on the inside. I deleted everything that made him special.
GPRailroad 1 week ago#4
KnivesCore714 posted...
snoochtonooch posted...
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many


Yeah but TLC was still sick 

Too Cool was also a good team
Too Cool was more over and entertaining than the "main event talent" we're saddled with today.
1984: Ironically the GOAT year.
Dynedux 1 week ago#5
snoochtonooch posted...
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many

More than three. Way more.

Unless you were 2 years old during the AE you'd realize that there was more than just Hardys, Dudleys and E&C
Noctis 906atk, Reberta 869atk,- 813.793.244
balaysked 1 week ago#6
Looking back with my memory, the Attitude Era was amazing. Physically looking back and watching shows on the Network, you realize how cheesy it was and the matches were really not that great, a lot of brawling with finish spamming.
Nyaaaaasowhenyaaagonnabuymahpizzabruh
Final_Revenger 1 week ago#7
Nah, the Attitude Era was awesome, but people have realized that just 1999 sucked monkey balls as there were very few good matches that year, most matches on RAW ended in a DQ and the storylines were the absolute worst of Russo's shit.

2000 is arguably the GOAT though, and 1998/2001 are also very good.
I completely respect your opinion, as long as you keep it to yourself.
justcusimasian 1 week ago#8
Every time people talk about the AE one of the most fondly remembered aspects is KURT ANGLE WITH HAIR

People can't stop talking about it

Kurt Angle with hair won the Monday Night Wars

Kurt Angle with hair beat the NWO

Kurt Angle's hair decidedly did NOT suck
GT: DeathByToffee
blingbling078 1 week ago#9
Attitude era and nwo era was greatest thing ever Monday nite wars were epic
blingbling078 1 week ago#10
Golden era still the king of teams

Demolition
Rockers
Legion of doom
Nasty boys
Steiners
Rock n roll express
Midnight express
Harlem heat
Bestoffuture 1 week ago#11
HHH in 99-01 was fucking fantastic.
...and that's the meaning of life.
http://i.imgur.com/WnXzh5U.gif
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#12
Dynedux posted...
snoochtonooch posted...
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many

More than three. Way more.

Unless you were 2 years old during the AE you'd realize that there was more than just Hardys, Dudleys and E&C

APA were garbage
Hollys were trash
Too Cool we're bottom tier talents
kaietai were jobbers
Headbangers were awful
New Ago Outlaws are legit one of the best teams of all time and I neglected them in my first post
Please tell me who these good teams were
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
bigblu89 1 week ago#13
Living through the Attitude Era the first time around was great. 

Rewatching the Attitude Era now, thinking it’s going to be just as entertaining as it was then... not so great.
Scorsese2002 1 week ago#14
bigblu89 posted...
Living through the Attitude Era the first time around was great. 

Rewatching the Attitude Era now, thinking it’s going to be just as entertaining as it was then... not so great.


One reason why I haven't watched any of it on the WWEN, I'm afraid the memories will be tarnished(right word?)
bigblu89 1 week ago#15
Scorsese2002 posted...
bigblu89 posted...
Living through the Attitude Era the first time around was great. 

Rewatching the Attitude Era now, thinking it’s going to be just as entertaining as it was then... not so great.


One reason why I haven't watched any of it on the WWEN, I'm afraid the memories will be tarnished(right word?)

My son loves the Royal Rumble match, so I started watching some from back then. It wasn’t pretty.
BaronNugget 1 week ago#16
I recognize that it was WWEs greatest time period, but there is no way we are going back to it, I mean loads of people kicked off over Jinder's promo a few weeks back, that was pretty tame compared to some of the stuff that went down in the Attitude Era.
MUFC- The Religion 
Miami Dolphins: Blissfully succumb to the whirling blackness of eternal oblivion
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#17
BaronNugget posted...
I recognize that it was WWEs greatest time period, but there is no way we are going back to it, I mean loads of people kicked off over Jinder's promo a few weeks back, that was pretty tame compared to some of the stuff that went down in the Attitude Era.

They could use elements from the AE that wasn't for vulgarity and shock, like how the entire roster would interact within one universe, every character had something to do, and they could pace the show better

It's not all about curse words and shots of diva crotch and cookie sheets
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
WarGreymon77 1 week ago#18
I agree, OP. It's just the hipster thing to discount the Attitude Era and call it overrated. Because "muh NXT".
cjpdk 1 week ago#19
snoochtonooch posted...
BaronNugget posted...
I recognize that it was WWEs greatest time period, but there is no way we are going back to it, I mean loads of people kicked off over Jinder's promo a few weeks back, that was pretty tame compared to some of the stuff that went down in the Attitude Era.

They could use elements from the AE that wasn't for vulgarity and shock, like how the entire roster would interact within one universe, every character had something to do, and they could pace the show better

It's not all about curse words and shots of diva crotch and cookie sheets


Exactly. The writing was better back then. The show felt less disjointed, there was an "anything could happen" atmosphere, and sensible booking decisions which excited fans were made.

Now the things from the AE we can leave behind:
o Bloodbaths (tho a little bit of blood at the right moments would be good today)
o Gratuitous swearing (tho we do need a higher standard of insults)
o Shit workrate (the one area in which the post-AE WWE is unquestionably better)
o Shock factor
o Women's """"""wrestling""""""
If mothers sue everything under the sun, then we will play in the shade.
''America had been discovered before Columbus, but it had always been hushed up''.
ssjmole 1 week ago#20
I didn't like that era too much. Super Austin , sexist match types , a Jerry Springer feel to it. Don't get me wrong Austin Vs rock at WM the first time was good but stuffike"oh now the ministry is mixed with corporation because .... Twist and feed everyone to Austin" annoyed me.

Not saying it was "unwatchable" or "100% bad" but honestly I preferred the Bret era or ruthless aggression era to AE
Signature, What's that?
llennroc 1 week ago#21
I was born in '93. Literally grew up on the Attitude Era and even though a person like me should be prone to those rose tinted shades, I find it completely cheese. The beginning of the Ruthless Aggression Era was the best WWE Tv I've witnessed. Mid 2000-late 2001 was decent but once we got "the F out" things got great.
The Sexy Beasts of the PWB 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTSjdc_H0eQ
WarGreymon77 1 week ago#22
Attitude Era matches were more exciting to watch. "Workrate" be damned.
BaronNugget 1 week ago#23
cjpdk posted...
snoochtonooch posted...
BaronNugget posted...
I recognize that it was WWEs greatest time period, but there is no way we are going back to it, I mean loads of people kicked off over Jinder's promo a few weeks back, that was pretty tame compared to some of the stuff that went down in the Attitude Era.

They could use elements from the AE that wasn't for vulgarity and shock, like how the entire roster would interact within one universe, every character had something to do, and they could pace the show better

It's not all about curse words and shots of diva crotch and cookie sheets


Exactly. The writing was better back then. The show felt less disjointed, there was an "anything could happen" atmosphere, and sensible booking decisions which excited fans were made.

Now the things from the AE we can leave behind:
o Bloodbaths (tho a little bit of blood at the right moments would be good today)
o Gratuitous swearing (tho we do need a higher standard of insults)
o Shit workrate (the one area in which the post-AE WWE is unquestionably better)
o Shock factor
o Women's """"""wrestling""""""


Having impromptu throwaway matches won't increase WWEs popularity to the levels it did 20 years ago, people won't get invested in the product just by wrestling matches, they need storylines that fans can get hyped about as well as promos that have good intensity and like it or not cursing helps that as does blood in matches themselves
MUFC- The Religion 
Miami Dolphins: Blissfully succumb to the whirling blackness of eternal oblivion
n00bsaib0t 1 week ago#24
snoochtonooch posted...
Dynedux posted...
snoochtonooch posted... 
Three great tag teams. Golden Age had about 3x as many

More than three. Way more. 

Unless you were 2 years old during the AE you'd realize that there was more than just Hardys, Dudleys and E&C

APA were garbage
Hollys were trash
Too Cool we're bottom tier talents
kaietai were jobbers
Headbangers were awful
New Ago Outlaws are legit one of the best teams of all time and I neglected them in my first post
Please tell me who these good teams were

All of those were great. Your opinion is trash. Also:
Bossman and Bull Buchanan
Test and Albert
Owen and Jarrett
D'Lo and Mark Henry

And then there's stable combinations (D'Lo and Henry kept tagging after the Nation split) and thrown together teams that worked great like the Unholy Alliance and Two Man Power Trip.
Steam/XBL/PSN/EU NNID - Nifterific | US NNID & Nintendo Account - n00bsaib0t
EU Nintendo Account - n00b_saib0t | SFV: Balrog | MKX: Sun God Kotal Kahn
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#25
Those are some of the worst teams I have ever seen. Can not come close to Demolition, the Hart Foundation, Steiner bros, bulldogs, strike force, rockers.....
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#26
Bull Buchanan. What the literal fuck
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
n00bsaib0t 1 week ago#27
Sorry you can't recognize a good match when you see it.
Steam/XBL/PSN/EU NNID - Nifterific | US NNID & Nintendo Account - n00bsaib0t
EU Nintendo Account - n00b_saib0t | SFV: Balrog | MKX: Sun God Kotal Kahn
TheCurseX2 1 week ago#28
AE is still better today as it was back then. 

The crowds actually being fans sells it to me. Watch Canadian Stampede's main event, the building was fucking shaking when Bret Hart came out.
As a Level 37 Sage, I expect to be treated with proper respect and acknowledged for my dedication to the GameFAQs Message Board Community as a whole. Thank you.
TheCurseX2 1 week ago#29
And Golden Age era had the better tag teams, easily. AE did have great tag teams though, and the division was still really great but compared to Golden Age? That was when tag team wrestling was at its best.
As a Level 37 Sage, I expect to be treated with proper respect and acknowledged for my dedication to the GameFAQs Message Board Community as a whole. Thank you.
jasten 1 week ago#30
2000 was amazing... but 99 mostly sucked and 98 was greatly hit or miss. The AE was a far cry from the 80s consistent quality. But 2000..... might be the best single year in wrestling simply for the WWF.
Dragon Age: Inquisition, Mass Effect: Andromeda, and Fallout 4 are the best games of this generation. Yes. I mean it.
ShadowRaiden00 1 week ago#31
Savoots 1 week ago#32
n00bsaib0t posted...
And then there's stable combinations (D'Lo and Henry kept tagging after the Nation split) and thrown together teams that worked great like the Unholy Alliance and Two Man Power Trip.


Don't forget Right To Censor, which Buchanan was a part of I believe.

It was a hilarious mock up of people who were offended by the AE.
The average American consumer is an entitled baby who cries when they can't get what they want.
n00bsaib0t 1 week ago#33
Savoots posted...
n00bsaib0t posted...
And then there's stable combinations (D'Lo and Henry kept tagging after the Nation split) and thrown together teams that worked great like the Unholy Alliance and Two Man Power Trip.


Don't forget Right To Censor, which Buchanan was a part of I believe.

It was a hilarious mock up of people who were offended by the AE.

I didn't forget, I just didn't name any stables. I left out the ministry, corporation, and DX as well.
Steam/XBL/PSN/EU NNID - Nifterific | US NNID & Nintendo Account - n00bsaib0t
EU Nintendo Account - n00b_saib0t | SFV: Balrog | MKX: Sun God Kotal Kahn
ssjmole 1 week ago#34
jasten posted...
2000 was amazing... but 99 mostly sucked and 98 was greatly hit or miss. The AE was a far cry from the 80s consistent quality. But 2000..... might be the best single year in wrestling simply for the WWF.


Except WM 2000 , at least for me that's the worst WM
Signature, What's that?
Savoots 1 week ago#35
n00bsaib0t posted...
I didn't forget, I just didn't name any stables.


But you listed stable combinations.....
The average American consumer is an entitled baby who cries when they can't get what they want.
n00bsaib0t 1 week ago#36
Savoots posted...
n00bsaib0t posted...
I didn't forget, I just didn't name any stables.


But you listed stable combinations.....

I said "stable combinations" and clarified that I listed D'Lo and Mark Henry because they still tagged after their stable disbanded. I didn't name any other stable combinations.
Steam/XBL/PSN/EU NNID - Nifterific | US NNID & Nintendo Account - n00bsaib0t
EU Nintendo Account - n00b_saib0t | SFV: Balrog | MKX: Sun God Kotal Kahn
#37
(message deleted)
Savoots 1 week ago#38
Look, whatever.

The AE regardless of quantity had a great tag division so let's just leave it at that.
The average American consumer is an entitled baby who cries when they can't get what they want.
ShadowRaiden00 1 week ago#39
Actual World Champion level guys

Amazing mid-card/upper mid

Actual Tag Teams

Even good curtain jerkers

also natural, great promos like these



good times
Snake 1 week ago#40
jasten posted...
2000 was amazing... but 99 mostly sucked and 98 was greatly hit or miss. The AE was a far cry from the 80s consistent quality. But 2000..... might be the best single year in wrestling simply for the WWF.


I agree, though I'd equate it closer to mid 00 - mid 01 when they hit their peak in all things creatively. They took the foundations Russo and Ferrara built and combined it with a better in ring wrestling product and it was fucking amazing. 

After rewatching through that period of WWF I couldn't deny that out of all the eras I've watched it was probably the peak of my enjoyment of wrestling. It was the combination of all the creative elements done right that make wrestling awesome. 

Great characters and great stories with non heavily scripted promos and interviews, great wrestling with longer overall matches than before with a faster more exciting pace not having to adhere to a slower safer style creating such an exciting, anything can happen atmosphere that comes off so great for TV. They also didn't treat their audience like idiots and actually seemed to put their best effort into everything. An absolute blast to watch as a wrestling fan. I've seen a ton of era's from multiple promotions and that period sticks out as having more positives than negatives that I've probably ever seen before in one continuous period from a single promotion.
Are you not....entertained!?
The Kamikaze 1 week ago#41
Snake posted...
I agree, though I'd equate it closer to mid 00 - mid 01 when they hit their peak in all things creatively.

I may be biased here but I think the first half of 2000 was far better than the second cause with the sloppy heel turns of Kane and especially Rikishi a lot of value was lost.
You can only win if you dare!
pricelesslegacy 1 week ago#42
llennroc posted...
I was born in '93. Literally grew up on the Attitude Era and even though a person like me should be prone to those rose tinted shades, I find it completely cheese. The beginning of the Ruthless Aggression Era was the best WWE Tv I've witnessed. Mid 2000-late 2001 was decent but once we got "the F out" things got great.

You weren't even 8 by the time the attitude era was over.
7/10 for me means it wasn't really bad or really good, but resting somewhere in the middle. -hulkhogan1
Maze_ 1 week ago#43
I don't think anyone dies the attitude era was great.

All that's happened is the Internet and social media was around then like it is now. Which means:

1. People have forgotten how stupid it was and how much of it was awful

2. People didn't on mass shit on every minute of it the way they do today.

Watch any random episode of Raw that you like and imagine this smarky internet audience watching it today live, they would loathe it.
When the going gets tough, the tough go have a little cry in the corner.
"Your mustache is crooked" ~ R.I.P Randy Savage.
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#44
Better tag team
t&a
Or
Tully Blanchard and Arn Anderson

It's just so hard to choose
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
snoochtonooch 1 week ago#45
Better tag team
head cheese 
Or
Money Inc.

God you guys might be right lol
http://www.last.fm/user/snoochtonooch
official protector of Cuddles the kitten of the rock board
n00bsaib0t 1 week ago#46
snoochtonooch posted...
Better tag team
t&a
Or
Tully Blanchard and Arn Anderson

It's just so hard to choose

Goal post moving.
Steam/XBL/PSN/EU NNID - Nifterific | US NNID & Nintendo Account - n00bsaib0t
EU Nintendo Account - n00b_saib0t | SFV: Balrog | MKX: Sun God Kotal Kahn
Heatseeker500 1 week ago#47
A lot of people prefer 2000 but to me I loved how grittier it was under Russo and Ferrara's writing. 1997 and 1998 are my favourite 2 years in wrestling, but I think 1999 is really underrated. Foley's feud with Rock, the early days of the Ministry, the rise of HHH, and Austin's feud with Vince hitting new heights were really enjoyable to watch in my opinion.

One of the problems I think 2000 had was that while the match quality may have improved and the roster was the most stacked of the AE years, a lot of the card didn't have as much going on and became an afterthought, such as D'Lo Brown, Kaientai, Mark Henry, Mideon, Mosh, Gangrel, Big Bossman, Viscera and Godfather. Val Venis is one that I think of being completely stripped of the character and writing that got him over, and nothing else they gave him really worked. I think they did Tazz a huge disservice as well. 

The spring of 2000 was in my opinion the pinnacle of that year, but I think the summer was a drop in quality on the weekly shows.
Man is like a piece of cheese...
ninjarobot_22 1 week ago#48
97 - 2002

Best years
WarGreymon77 1 week ago#49
The writing was more coherent in 2000, but my favorite year of the WWF/E is 1998.

Best Kane (well, maybe a bit of badass decay compared to '97), best Taker, best DX, prime babyface Austin, prime McMahon/Corporation, best Sunday Night Heat, best Raw Is War (2000's arena is pretty good tho), and my favorite low/midcard gimmicks.

'97 had some good promos, but there not many clear-cut babyfaces during that time, and the roster was still trying to recover from the New Generation years. People tend to overlook the bland stuff from '97. But I will say, the WWF definitely started to turn things around with the introduction of the Titantron and Raw Is War.

'99 is probably the peak of Wrestlecrap for the Attitude Era (and for WCW), but people forget that we got some good stuff too. Before it got merged with the Corporation, the Ministry was fun. We had prime Shane. Hot Stephanie. The Brood. Debut of SmackDown!. Jericho. Kane & X-Pac's tag team entrance. Trish, I think. Lita, I think. Some of The Rock's best promos.

2001 was good before the Invasion...
AndreLeGeant 1 week ago#50
It's just late spring and summer 99 that wasn't super great. And even then we had Rock and Foley.
I don't drink. I don't smoke. I don't do drugs. I am your sXe hero.
They should build a mosque in mecca. Right next to the dome of the rock. -- Lord Sideous
  1. Boards
  2. Pro Wrestling: WWE 
  3. When we stop pretending to pretend the Attitude Era wasn't great?

No comments:

Post a Comment