Why are smarks so entitled?

1. Boards
2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
3. Why are smarks so entitled?

nurnberg 1 week ago#1 What make them think certain wrestlers deserve to be pushed and get championships? They think that nearly everybody in the business should be pushed, then they complain when it doesn't happen. Why are they so entitled? stickyreportquote

DizzyTechno 1 week ago#2 I paid for Vince McMahon's house, he owes me. ironic love for yoshi tatsu reportquote

HatchetandShank 1 week ago#3 To opinions? I dunno. Thought that was like a right or a saying or something. Toni Storm | Strong Zero | Champion http://i.imgur.com/VN9KIgQ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MVPg0cy.gif http://i.imgur.com/1x6wpn4.gif http://i.imgur.com/vhqCPse.jpg reportquote

Mr_Yooj 1 week ago#4 In these days, everyone feels entitled. If you're reading this then you're pretty awesome! ^_^ If you can't find light, then you need to make fire. reportquote

MrSCARY 1 week ago#5 It's almost like people are paying money, and because of that, have certain expectations and opinions on the value of the product they're paying for, or something.  It's similar to this thing that's been a thing for a while, known as customers. It's a pretty interesting concept, you should check it out. reportquote

Bahamut knight zero 1 week ago#6 Something about being spoiled or some other term JUS FC: 4854-3681-3756 (Kayin12) PSN: BahamutKnight0 reportquote

Veggeta X 1 week ago#7 MrSCARY posted... It's almost like people are paying money, and because of that, have certain expectations and opinions on the value of the product they're paying for, or something.  It's similar to this thing that's been a thing for a while, known as customers. It's a pretty interesting concept, you should check it out. You ain't done pay s*** so STFU. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Veggeta X 1 week ago#8 WWE is Subway Smarks is that lady crying over nonsense I'm the camera guy showing you are awful it is to be a smark Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia (edited 1 week ago)reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#9 bump so people can see my awesome comparison video Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

pycho316 6 days ago#10 If you'd paid for as many wrestler's houses as I have, TC, you'd be expecting a little something in return too. Cancel one book and two more shall take it's place. Hail Marvel. - Reaper115 reportquote

Raven_Cyarm 6 days ago#11 MrSCARY posted... It's almost like people are paying money, and because of that, have certain expectations and opinions on the value of the product they're paying for, or something.  It's similar to this thing that's been a thing for a while, known as customers. It's a pretty interesting concept, you should check it out. That would make sense if a percentage of smarks didn't just stream everything, never buy merch or go to live shows and only post about it online. It's "Hahaha". Not "Bahaha" or "Bwahaha". You're not a pirate or a moustache twirling villain. You're a human. Laugh like one. reportquote

UnicornWizard 6 days ago#12 Who are your top 5 current wrestlers Veggeta? Not Changing this sig until Big E wins a world championship or is released. 3/1/2017 reportquote

Darkel_Low 6 days ago#13 Literally the only reason Cesaro isn't a complete jobber in WWE is because I've supported him as a fan. He owes me his whole career. Lions 0-0 / Wolverines: 1-0 (1) Dean Ambrose (2) Pete Dunne (3) Nikki Cross (4) Neville (5) 'Cien' Almas (6) Peyton Royce (7) Aleister Black (8) Drew McIntyre reportquote

Darkel_Low 6 days ago#14 UnicornWizard posted... Who are your top 5 current wrestlers @Veggeta_X? Lions 0-0 / Wolverines: 1-0 (1) Dean Ambrose (2) Pete Dunne (3) Nikki Cross (4) Neville (5) 'Cien' Almas (6) Peyton Royce (7) Aleister Black (8) Drew McIntyre reportquote

pycho316 6 days ago#15 Darkel_Low posted... Literally the only reason Cesaro isn't a complete jobber in WWE is because I've supported him as a fan. He owes me his whole career. I'll see your "supported him as a fan" and raise you an "I bought his shirt one time"  Right now Cesaro comes over to my house and washes my car alternating weekends and will continue to do so for the next 3 years. Cancel one book and two more shall take it's place. Hail Marvel. - Reaper115 reportquote

Darkel_Low 6 days ago#16 pycho316 posted... Darkel_Low posted... Literally the only reason Cesaro isn't a complete jobber in WWE is because I've supported him as a fan. He owes me his whole career. I'll see your "supported him as a fan" and raise you an "I bought his shirt one time"  Right now Cesaro comes over to my house and washes my car alternating weekends and will continue to do so for the next 3 years. Always wondered what he did the weekends he wasn't cleaning my pool. Lions 0-0 / Wolverines: 1-0 (1) Dean Ambrose (2) Pete Dunne (3) Nikki Cross (4) Neville (5) 'Cien' Almas (6) Peyton Royce (7) Aleister Black (8) Drew McIntyre reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#17 Cena Roman Jinder Orton Jericho(If he doesn't count then Ambrose) Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#18 last bump I swear Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 6 days ago#19 MrSCARY posted... It's almost like people are paying money, and because of that, have certain expectations and opinions on the value of the product they're paying for, or something.  It's similar to this thing that's been a thing for a while, known as customers. It's a pretty interesting concept, you should check it out. This. Signature, What's that? reportquote

pricelesslegacy 6 days ago#20 Something about snowflakes I think reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#21 Veggeta X posted... WWE is Subway Smarks is that lady crying over nonsense I'm the camera guy showing you are awful it is to be a smark Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 6 days ago#22 ssjmole posted... MrSCARY posted... It's almost like people are paying money, and because of that, have certain expectations and opinions on the value of the product they're paying for, or something.  It's similar to this thing that's been a thing for a while, known as customers. It's a pretty interesting concept, you should check it out. This. Signature, What's that? reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#23 You know on the back of a potato chip bag is says call if not completely satisfied? Like, you bought a bag of chips, more or less you're gonna get what it is, a bag of chips. And if it's s***ty you just suck it up and move on so who in the hell would really call that number? Smarks would. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 6 days ago#24 Veggeta X posted... You know on the back of a potato chip bag is says call if not completely satisfied? Like, you bought a bag of chips, more or less you're gonna get what it is, a bag of chips. And if it's s***ty you just suck it up and move on so who in the hell would really call that number? Smarks would. Smarks like you? Also potatoe chip companies aren't always bragging about fan feedback and feeling the crowd reactions ect... WWE encourages if they thrive on it. They even sold a "Cena sucks shirt" to profit off it. Also the idea of move on is silly with a TV show. People like it and want it to be better. If everyday who ever had a problem stopped watching WWE network would crumble as it's only really for die-hard fans right now and wwe would go bankrupt. Why would you want that? Fans in entertainment speak up and it can make changes. Like famously Deadpool was going to end with #25 but fans complained and complained he came back in the 1990s and look now he's one of their best selling properties.  If fans say "we don't want Roman reigns" WWE should try going a different route. Stone cold worked as fans wanted him. Dean Ambrose would have been the perfect choice not long ago but the Austin podcast and bad booking sabotaged him. Imagine if Coca-Cola never got rid of new coke and brought back classic. It would not be around today. Signature, What's that? reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#25 ssjmole posted... Smarks like you? Naw. I wouldn't call so it's not like me. Smarks like YOU would. ssjmole posted... Also potatoe chip companies aren't always bragging about fan feedback and feeling the crowd reactions ect... Yes they do. What company doesn't talk about customers loving the s*** out of their products and talk about how greatly rated they are? ssjmole posted... Also the idea of move on is silly with a TV show. No it's not. There are tons of TV shows I've watched that got boring to me and I've stopped watching that are still successful. Whatever is bad to me doesn't mean it's bad for everyone and vice versa. Imagine that. ssjmole posted... People like it and want it to be better. Smarks don't. They like to complain no matter what. They are sad hypercriticals who will never be happy even when given what they want. ssjmole posted... If everyday who ever had a problem stopped watching WWE network would crumble as it's only really for die-hard fans right now and wwe would go bankrupt. Why would you want that? Not thinking WWE is perfect isn't the problem. The problem is you smarks go on entitled manchild-temper tantrums acting like you know everything while acting like you know what is best for the WWE as a whole when you really don't. You complainers will never know the different between that. ssjmole posted... Fans in entertainment speak up and it can make changes. Again, there is a difference from giving proper legitimate feedback and criticism vs acting like a whiny baby. You smarks have convinced yourself that acting like a whiny baby is some righteous positive feedback that eve God would agree with. ssjmole posted... If fans say "we don't want Roman reigns" WWE should try going a different route. Thank God they don't listen to smarks. They'd truly be out of business. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#26 Please watch the video I posted. That irrational crazy lady being extreme ARE smarks. You're literally justifying that lady. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 6 days ago#27 Veggeta X posted... Please watch the video I posted. That irrational crazy lady being extreme ARE smarks. You're literally justifying that lady. And your "don't complain " and your narrative of "I'm not a smark that's fake news" makes you exactly like some president we all know. Good job. Signature, What's that? reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#28 I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Veggeta X 6 days ago#29 You smarks think there's no consequences to having an opinion. Smarks think they can say whatever they wanna say and people just have to deal with it. That's entitlement to a new f***ing level. Yeah, you have the right to say whatever you want to say just like I have to right to tell you your opinion is stupid as f***. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 6 days ago#30 Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Sorry but you are a smark by its deffition. You keep lumping me in with the ones who complain for no reason. I'm not you I still use the proper meaning for smark. And that's you a smark. Signature, What's that? reportquote

Swordsman0 5 days ago#31 Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. "Why would anyone stop baiting their weasel?" GuideToTheDark 3DS FC 0817-4942-4831 (edited 5 days ago)reportquote

ssjmole 5 days ago#32 Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. Yep Signature, What's that? reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#33 ssjmole posted... You keep lumping me in with the ones who complain for no reason. But you're the one arguing that your complaints are legit. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 5 days ago#34 Veggeta X posted... ssjmole posted... You keep lumping me in with the ones who complain for no reason. But you're the one arguing that your complaints are legit. I'm arguing complaints are. Some hate Cena they complain. Personally I like him still means that's a valid complaint smark Signature, What's that? reportquote

SmashBurb 5 days ago#35 It wouldn't be so obnoxious if they'd form their own valid opinions rather than just liking people entirely because of where they came from. It's always "Ex-ROH/NJPW guys = completely perfect gods who should never lose, WWE homegrown talent = talentless garbage". reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#36 @Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/218-pro-wrestling-wwe/75204694 Have fun reading. I've explained this a million times already. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia (edited 5 days ago)reportquote

Darkel_Low 5 days ago#37 SmashBurb posted... It wouldn't be so obnoxious if they'd form their own valid opinions rather than just liking people entirely because of where they came from. It's always "Ex-ROH/NJPW guys = completely perfect gods who should never lose, WWE homegrown talent = talentless garbage". That's true, people are always saying this. Mike Kanellis = completely perfect god who should never lose Braun Strowman = talentless garbage Wait, no one says this. Lions 0-0 / Wolverines: 1-0 (1) Dean Ambrose (2) Pete Dunne (3) Nikki Cross (4) Neville (5) 'Cien' Almas (6) Peyton Royce (7) Aleister Black (8) Drew McIntyre (edited 5 days ago)reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#38 ssjmole posted... Veggeta X posted... ssjmole posted... You keep lumping me in with the ones who complain for no reason. But you're the one arguing that your complaints are legit. I'm arguing complaints are. Some hate Cena they complain. Personally I like him still means that's a valid complaint smark You make no god damn sense. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 5 days ago#39 Veggeta X posted... Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/218-pro-wrestling-wwe/75204694 Have fun reading. I've been wrong about this a million times already. Fixd Signature, What's that? reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#40 Darkel_Low posted... SmashBurb posted... It wouldn't be so obnoxious if they'd form their own valid opinions rather than just liking people entirely because of where they came from. It's always "Ex-ROH/NJPW guys = completely perfect gods who should never lose, WWE homegrown talent = talentless garbage". That's true, people are always saying this. Mike Kanellis = completely perfect god who should never lose Braun Strowman = talentless garbage Wait, no one says this. *looks at sig* Typical smark. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Darkel_Low 5 days ago#41 Veggeta X posted... *looks at sig* Typical smark. *looks at sig* Typical anti-smark. Lions 0-0 / Wolverines: 1-0 (1) Dean Ambrose (2) Pete Dunne (3) Nikki Cross (4) Neville (5) 'Cien' Almas (6) Peyton Royce (7) Aleister Black (8) Drew McIntyre reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#42 ssjmole posted... Veggeta X posted... Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/218-pro-wrestling-wwe/75204694 Have fun reading. I've been wrong about this a million times already. Fixd You've yet to ever prove I am wrong other then just saying it. I mean I guess you're wrong too if i just told you are right? Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

SmashBurb 5 days ago#43 Darkel_Low posted... SmashBurb posted... It wouldn't be so obnoxious if they'd form their own valid opinions rather than just liking people entirely because of where they came from. It's always "Ex-ROH/NJPW guys = completely perfect gods who should never lose, WWE homegrown talent = talentless garbage". That's true, people are always saying this. Mike Kanellis = completely perfect god who should never lose Braun Strowman = talentless garbage Wait, no one says this. Actually people were saying that about Braun Strowman up until they started having him destroy Roman Reigns every week. He was "boring and greener than grass" when he was squashing local talent and indy darling Sami Zayn. The moment they have Strowman feud with an IWC darling again, you guys are going to turn on him. And please, Mike Kanellis is the exception, not the rule. You're being disingenuous by pretending that what I'm saying isn't the case. (edited 5 days ago)reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#44 Darkel_Low posted... Veggeta X posted... *looks at sig* Typical smark. *looks at sig* Typical anti-smark. Proud of it. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 5 days ago#45 Veggeta X posted... ssjmole posted... Veggeta X posted... Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/218-pro-wrestling-wwe/75204694 Have fun reading. I've been wrong about this a million times already. Fixd You've yet to ever prove I am wrong other then just saying it. I mean I guess you're wrong too if i just told you are right? That's all you do even you long drawn out snowflake post "waaaaaa don't call me a smark smarks all ways complain *posts nothing but complaining about smarks*" why are you so entitled smark than you get to complain and no one else? Your Sig says "don't like don't watch" well "don't like smarks don't post on a wrestling board" simple no? Signature, What's that? (edited 5 days ago)reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#46 Are you new here? I love complaining about smarks. I love to come here to complain about smarks. Does that bother you? And obviously there's a difference between the smarks I'm complaining about and me. i'm sorry you can't see that. But like I said you're free to stay ignorant. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

ssjmole 5 days ago#47 Veggeta X posted... Are you new here? I love complaining about smarks. I love to come here to complain about smarks. Does that bother you? And obviously there's a difference between the smarks I'm complaining about and me. i'm sorry you can't see that. But like I said you're free to stay ignorant. And they love voicing their opinion. Them , you. You , them. Still smarks. I'm a smark you're a smark. Everyone posting here. Sorry if your so triggered by what you are. But embrace it don't hate it. You are 100% a smark. Deal with it kid. Signature, What's that? reportquote

Fatestaykitchen 5 days ago#48 All fans of wnything want the product to be what they want. Everyone wants everything thing to be how they want all of the time.  This is a dumb question. But you knew that already. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I8IVn0MQsWA  Just a reminder that we live in a world where "twerk assault" can be said unironically reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#49 ssjmole posted... And they love voicing their opinion. Them , you. You , them. Still smarks. I'm a smark you're a smark. Everyone posting here. Sorry if your so triggered by what you are. But embrace it don't hate it. You are 100% a smark. Deal with it kid. There you go acting like me and you are the same again. Clearly we disagree but we are still the same right? Do you see how flawed you are yet? Prolly not. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

Veggeta X 5 days ago#50 Fatestaykitchen posted... All fans of wnything want the product to be what they want. Everyone wants everything thing to be how they want all of the time.  This is a dumb question. But you knew that already. Well that's not a question and no I don't think the WWE should cater to my every want nor do I think my opinion is some grand opinion that people needs to take heed of what I have to say. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

1. Boards
2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
3. Why are smarks so entitled?
   
   1. Boards
   2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
   3. Why are smarks so entitled?

   Swordsman0 4 days ago#51 Veggeta X posted... @Swordsman0 posted... Veggeta X posted... I never said don't complain. You can complain all you want. Just be ready to be criticized for the s*** you say. And you keep calling me a smark like I'm the same as the complainers. We're not the same obviously. That's insulting to me. Are you aware that WWE is scripted? Do you enjoy the product? You are then, by definition, a smark. In fact, your use of the word incorrectly is looking more and more like a desperate attempt to distance yourself from the fact that you are. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/218-pro-wrestling-wwe/75204694 Have fun reading. I've explained this a million times already. The only thing I get from that it it's more of you trying to duck the fact that you're exactly what you complain about. As for why we're 'so entitled?' Because WWE goes out of it's way to acknowledge that we are part of the show, the 'WWE Universe'. Why should we not be vocal, not make demands, when the company itself tells us that's what we're supposed to be doing? After all, if they didn't want the fans involved, they'd film on a sound stage, not in front of a crowd that they charge to be there. "Why would anyone stop baiting their weasel?" GuideToTheDark 3DS FC 0817-4942-4831 reportquote

   Veggeta X 4 days ago#52 @Swordsman0 posted... The only thing I get from that it it's more of you trying to duck the fact that you're exactly what you complain about. So you're admitting to say that words can't and won't evolve gotcha. Funny thing is you probably have used words to mean something else before but with this specific case you're just choosing to be ignorant and purposely stubborn. @Swordsman0 posted... Because WWE goes out of it's way to acknowledge that we are part of the show, the 'WWE Universe'. Why should we not be vocal, not make demands, when the company itself tells us that's what we're supposed to be doing?After all, if they didn't want the fans involved, they'd film on a sound stage, not in front of a crowd that they charge to be there. Because throwing manchild temper tantrums and threatening fake take overs and fake riot is the way to go. Good job. Act more like that crazy lady in the video I posted please. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

   truffleshuffles 4 days ago#53 Half the world feels like they are entitled for s*** they don't deserve. reportquote

   Veggeta X 4 days ago#54 truffleshuffles posted... Half the world feels like they are entitled for s*** they don't deserve. The problem is being self-aware of it. Most people who thinks they deserve the world don't know they're being an entitled baby. They think they're being fair and just. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

   Swordsman0 4 days ago#55 Veggeta X posted... @Swordsman0 posted... The only thing I get from that it it's more of you trying to duck the fact that you're exactly what you complain about. So you're admitting to say that words can't and won't evolve gotcha. Funny thing is you probably have used words to mean something else before but with this specific case you're just choosing to be ignorant and purposely stubborn. @Swordsman0 posted... Because WWE goes out of it's way to acknowledge that we are part of the show, the 'WWE Universe'. Why should we not be vocal, not make demands, when the company itself tells us that's what we're supposed to be doing?After all, if they didn't want the fans involved, they'd film on a sound stage, not in front of a crowd that they charge to be there. Because throwing manchild temper tantrums and threatening fake take overs and fake riot is the way to go. Good job. Act more like that crazy lady in the video I posted please. To begin with, I never said anything like that. Your post in that topic doesn't come off as using a word in a different or evolved way. It comes off as you trying as hard as you can to distance yourself from a word so you can throw it around as an insult to make yourself feel better. That's what I'm suggesting. And second: Takeovers of business and other public places have always been used as a nonviolent means to enact change. Attacking people for trying to organize them or laughing at them for trying to force a change they feel is needed is, in any respect, the sign of someone who is, in fact, entitled. "Why would anyone stop baiting their weasel?" GuideToTheDark 3DS FC 0817-4942-4831 reportquote

   Veggeta X 4 days ago#56 Swordsman0 posted... Your post in that topic doesn't come off as using a word in a different or evolved way. Are you new here? That's exactly what I have been doing. Swordsman0 posted... It comes off as you trying as hard as you can to distance yourself from a word so you can throw it around as an insult to make yourself feel better. It's both. I don't want to identify to the stereotypical negative traits that comes along with being a smark. It's like being a millennial but then not wanting to be identified as the stereotypical negative traits with the term. This isn't hard to understand. Language is, at its simplest, the way that we communicate, and so if I say something and what I say means something now that it didn't mean in the past, it's effectively changed by virtue of the fact that people know that I'm using the updated meaning. Swordsman0 posted... Takeovers of business and other public places have always been used as a nonviolent means to enact change. From literal corrupt oppressive entities. Is that what you're actually thinking WWE is? Once again with the extreme logics. Swordsman0 posted... Attacking people for trying to organize them or laughing at them for trying to force a change they feel is needed is, in any respect, the sign of someone who is, in fact, entitled. You think I'm being entitled for tell you you're acting entitled? Holy f***. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

   Swordsman0 4 days ago#57 Veggeta X posted... Swordsman0 posted... Your post in that topic doesn't come off as using a word in a different or evolved way. Are you new here? That's exactly what I have been doing. Swordsman0 posted... It comes off as you trying as hard as you can to distance yourself from a word so you can throw it around as an insult to make yourself feel better. It's both. I don't want to identify to the stereotypical negative traits that comes along with being a smark. It's like being a millennial but then not wanting to be identified as the stereotypical negative traits with the term. This isn't hard to understand. Language is, at its simplest, the way that we communicate, and so if I say something and what I say means something now that it didn't mean in the past, it's effectively changed by virtue of the fact that people know that I'm using the updated meaning. Swordsman0 posted... Takeovers of business and other public places have always been used as a nonviolent means to enact change. From literal corrupt oppressive entities. Is that what you're actually thinking WWE is? Once again with the extreme logics. Swordsman0 posted... Attacking people for trying to organize them or laughing at them for trying to force a change they feel is needed is, in any respect, the sign of someone who is, in fact, entitled. You think I'm being entitled for tell you you're acting entitled? Holy f***. Lets go in order. 1. You trying to force a word to be different because you want it to be, doesn't mean it is. The world doesn't have to accept something just because it's what you want. I'll come back to this in a second. 2. You admit to trying to force a change to a word so it can be used as an insult to others and make yourself feel better. I'll no longer respond to this point, as it's moot. 3. They turn down mics in the crowd, change boos to cheers in promos and have announcers regularly try to play off what the live crowd is doing as something else entirely. This isn't a logical extreme, WWE, on a regular basis, tries to oppress and run misinformation on what it would call a part of itself. 4. You demand answers out of a group that has a different view than you, attempt to mock them into silence, and try to force your wills onto others, complaining when they refuse because, as you said, you see yourself as better. Yes Veggie. You are the literal definition of entitled. "Why would anyone stop baiting their weasel?" GuideToTheDark 3DS FC 0817-4942-4831 (edited 4 days ago)reportquote

   Veggeta X 3 days ago#58 Swordsman0 posted... 1. You trying to force a word to be different because you want it to be, doesn't mean it is. The world doesn't have to accept something just because it's what you want. I'll come back to this in a second. Amazing. Like I told the other guy, I'm not the one who made the term what it is today. The IWC did. Search anywhere what describes a smark these days. Reddit, here, urban dictionary, Google. They will define a smark as something very similar to what I'm describing them. Please, I'd love to take all the credit for what it means now but it's just not true. The problem isn't that I'm forcing my own definition of the word to you which isn't true. The problem is you're unable to accept that the term became something negative and stereotypical. Swordsman0 posted... 2. You admit to trying to force a change to a word so it can be used as an insult to others and make yourself feel better. I'll no longer respond to this point, as it's moot. That's quite the narrative and fairy tale to believe that I'm the originator of forcing the word to evolve into a negative term. Where did I admit that? Swordsman0 posted... 3. They turn down mics in the crowd, change boos to cheers in promos and have announcers regularly try to play off what the live crowd is doing as something else entirely. This isn't a logical extreme, WWE, on a regular basis, tries to oppress and run misinformation on what it would call a part of itself. Are you new to wrestling? They try to manipulate the fans and crowd and spin s*** all the f***ing time since the beginning of time. Swordsman0 posted... 4. You demand answers out of a group that has a different view than you, attempt to mock them into silence, and try to force your wills onto others, complaining when they refuse because, as you said, you see yourself as better. I'm treating you smarks the same way you treat the WWE. I'm complaining about you smarks the same way you are treating the WWE. The WWE is oppressing you? You're oppressing me! And like I said many many times already, you can say whatever you want to say just be ready to pay the price for it. I'll just repeat what I said to the other guy to you. You smarks think there's no consequences to having an opinion. Smarks think they can say whatever they wanna say and people just have to deal with it. That's entitlement to a new f***ing level. Yeah, you have the right to say whatever you want to say just like I have to right to tell you your opinion is stupid as f***. And yes, I don't come to the Internet to complain about a show that's giving death. That makes me a million times better than the average smark. Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

   Swordsman0 3 days ago#59 Veggeta X posted... Swordsman0 posted... 1. You trying to force a word to be different because you want it to be, doesn't mean it is. The world doesn't have to accept something just because it's what you want. I'll come back to this in a second. Amazing. Like I told the other guy, I'm not the one who made the term what it is today. The IWC did. Search anywhere what describes a smark these days. Reddit, here, urban dictionary, Google. They will define a smark as something very similar to what I'm describing them. Please, I'd love to take all the credit for what it means now but it's just not true. The problem isn't that I'm forcing my own definition of the word to you which isn't true. The problem is you're unable to accept that the term became something negative and stereotypical. Swordsman0 posted... 2. You admit to trying to force a change to a word so it can be used as an insult to others and make yourself feel better. I'll no longer respond to this point, as it's moot. That's quite the narrative and fairy tale to believe that I'm the originator of forcing the word to evolve into a negative term. Where did I admit that? Swordsman0 posted... 3. They turn down mics in the crowd, change boos to cheers in promos and have announcers regularly try to play off what the live crowd is doing as something else entirely. This isn't a logical extreme, WWE, on a regular basis, tries to oppress and run misinformation on what it would call a part of itself. Are you new to wrestling? They try to manipulate the fans and crowd and spin s*** all the f***ing time since the beginning of time. Swordsman0 posted... 4. You demand answers out of a group that has a different view than you, attempt to mock them into silence, and try to force your wills onto others, complaining when they refuse because, as you said, you see yourself as better. I'm treating you smarks the same way you treat the WWE. I'm complaining about you smarks the same way you are treating the WWE. The WWE is oppressing you? You're oppressing me! And like I said many many times already, you can say whatever you want to say just be ready to pay the price for it. I'll just repeat what I said to the other guy to you. You smarks think there's no consequences to having an opinion. Smarks think they can say whatever they wanna say and people just have to deal with it. That's entitlement to a new f***ing level. Yeah, you have the right to say whatever you want to say just like I have to right to tell you your opinion is stupid as f***. And yes, I don't come to the Internet to complain about a show that's giving death. That makes me a million times better than the average smark. The literal definition of entitled. "Why would anyone stop baiting their weasel?" GuideToTheDark 3DS FC 0817-4942-4831 reportquote

   Lupin the 4th 3 days ago#60 It's hilarious that Veggie still thinks there can be only one blanket type of smark. That's like saying because somebody's a movie buff that they have the exact same opinion as all other movie buffs. Smarks come in all types. The particular type he seems to be complaining about would be what I'll dub as general "Indy smarks" while Veggie would be a "WWE smark".  Still a smark though. Don't like it? Don't post (and expect to not be called out on it). The Smiling Bandit (Strikes Again! Ha Ha Ha!) 3DS FC: 2793 0791 3739 PSN: Arsene_Lupin_IV reportquote

   pricelesslegacy 3 days ago#61 SmashBurb posted... Darkel_Low posted... SmashBurb posted... It wouldn't be so obnoxious if they'd form their own valid opinions rather than just liking people entirely because of where they came from. It's always "Ex-ROH/NJPW guys = completely perfect gods who should never lose, WWE homegrown talent = talentless garbage". That's true, people are always saying this. Mike Kanellis = completely perfect god who should never lose Braun Strowman = talentless garbage Wait, no one says this. Actually people were saying that about Braun Strowman up until they started having him destroy Roman Reigns every week. He was "boring and greener than grass" when he was squashing local talent and indy darling Sami Zayn. The moment they have Strowman feud with an IWC darling again, you guys are going to turn on him. And please, Mike Kanellis is the exception, not the rule. You're being disingenuous by pretending that what I'm saying isn't the case. Stroman started get praised right after they broke him from the Wyatts. It was slow, but it started way before he got to roman. reportquote

   Veggeta X 3 days ago#62 Lupin the 4th posted... It's hilarious that Veggie still thinks there can be only one blanket type of smark. That's like saying because somebody's a movie buff that they have the exact same opinion as all other movie buffs. Smarks come in all types. The particular type he seems to be complaining about would be what I'll dub as general "Indy smarks" while Veggie would be a "WWE smark".  Still a smark though. Don't like it? Don't post (and expect to not be called out on it). Uhh where did I ever say there could only be one type of smark? I've been trying to explain to smarks the whole time what the term has now come to, not by me, but by virtue of the IWC. And look at you making up terms and yet going apes*** about me using a term I didn't even create. LOL! Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple FFBE ID: 196 912 851 1000+ MAG Fryevia reportquote

   1. Boards
   2. Pro Wrestling: WWE 
   3. Why are smarks so entitled?