Search

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

I don't see how Roman/Brock at WM34 is a good idea at all

  1. Boards
  2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
  3. I don't see how Roman/Brock at WM34 is a good idea at all
JoCrazy 2 days ago#1
At least at 31, they had the option of Seth running in to save the match. 

The rumor is for Roman to become Universal Champion. I just don't see how this possibly will go well. The fans are gonna s*** all over it. The fans will be extra salty if Roman ends up winning the Rumble again. 

Braun/Brock & Cena/Roman would have made a lot more sense for WM than a f***ing RAW B-PPV. 

There is no good outcome. Even a heel turn with Shield reunion, it would still be too late for Roman. People are over him and it's just gets annoying the more he gets pushed.
X-Box One Gamertag: KrankDaddy - Currently playing: Mass Effect, WWE 2K17, GTA Online
https://www.twitch.tv/krankdaddy & https://beam.pro/KrankDaddy
Bestoffuture 2 days ago#2
Lesnar leaves and passes the torch to the Big Dawg. What's not to love?
...and that's the meaning of life.
http://i.imgur.com/WnXzh5U.gif
SmashBurb 2 days ago#3
JoCrazy posted...
Braun/Brock & Cena/Roman would have made a lot more sense for WM than a f***ing RAW B-PPV.


lolno

Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns. Nobody liked him as the Black Sheep, and people were b****ing endlessly when he was squashing Sami Zayn. 

The second Braun starts feuding with another indy darling, you guys will all suddenly start hating him. He's not a long-term IWC favorite.
(edited 2 days ago)reportquote
DeathX2270 2 days ago#4
SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?
Space for Rent
Yeah the first match was such a dud. Not what you'd want in a freaking WrestleMania main event.
If you feed them, they'll continue. It's that simple.
Why do you continue to watch something that you don't like weekly? I don't get it.
ClayGuida 2 days ago#6
None of the Reigns Main Events were good ideas at all and the crowd s*** on all of them. Didn't stop Vince from shoveling s*** into fans mouths week after week. 

It'll happen, we'll all hate it, the trolls will love it, and hopefully people continue to stop watching. Eventually only the trolls will be tuning into to Raw.
lolAmerica
SmashBurb 2 days ago#7
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?


Yes, the people in the crowd popping for Braun are smarks.

Do you think casuals are the ones singing along to NXT guys entrance themes, too? Casual fans didn't know who the f*** Shinsuke Nakamura was until he arrived on Smackdown.
(edited 2 days ago)reportquote
DeathX2270 2 days ago#8
SmashBurb posted...
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?


Yes, the people in the crowd popping for Braun are smarks.

Do you think casuals are the ones singing along to NXT guys entrance themes, too? Casual fans didn't know who the f*** Shinsuke Nakamura was until he arrived on Smackdown.

Braun didn't get a reaction in the first year he was on the Raw. They grew his character on TV and he slowly won the fans over. Acting like that didn't happen is just stupid.
Space for Rent
Sephiroth311 2 days ago#9
It's happening because people are going to make more noise for it than they will all this year. If you don't want it to happen let Reigns come out to crickets every night and stop booing him
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!
#10
(message deleted)
The worst part of the plan to me is, Lesnar holding the title for an entire f***ing year. >_<
Just give it to Roman now. Get it the f*** over with. I don't even care anymore. Just get it off Lesnar for f*** sakes!

Also, if Roman main events a 4th WM in a row, will that be a record? What a joke, 4 straight WM main events when the crowd doesn't even like him and he's still early in his career...

SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns. Nobody liked him as the Black Sheep, and people were b****ing endlessly when he was squashing Sami Zayn. 

The second Braun starts feuding with another indy darling, you guys will all suddenly start hating him. He's not a long-term IWC favorite.

I just want to put it on the record, right now...
I have always hated Braun, I still hate Braun today, I will always hate Braun. Dude's a talentless hoss with none of the wrestling or mic skills of several much better giants in the past had. He can't even get a "silent, enigmatic mystique" (the typical fallback plan for a big guy who can't talk) right w/ his social media activity.
Don't call me a hypocrite or flip-flopper when everyone else comes to their senses.
mrlowrider 2 days ago#12
Because their first match was f***ing awesome

We deserve a rematch that doesn't have some flippy sandpaper-throaty crossfit nerd stealing a proper decision from us
Secretary to the B0$$
http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
streamofthesky posted...
The worst part of the plan to me is, Lesnar holding the title for an entire f***ing year. >_<
Just give it to Roman now. Get it the f*** over with. I don't even care anymore. Just get it off Lesnar for f*** sakes!


https://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/5/54/Brock_Lesnar_the_beast.png/revision/latest?cb=20161227173002
If you feed them, they'll continue. It's that simple.
Why do you continue to watch something that you don't like weekly? I don't get it.
Concurd 2 days ago#14
ClayGuida posted...
None of the Reigns Main Events were good ideas at all and the crowd s*** on all of them. Didn't stop Vince from shoveling s*** into fans mouths week after week. 

It'll happen, we'll all hate it, the trolls will love it, and hopefully people continue to stop watching. Eventually only the trolls will be tuning into to Raw.


Lol at people who have a different opinion than you being trolls. So cool.
"Change please."
ClayGuida 1 day ago#15
Concurd posted...
ClayGuida posted...
None of the Reigns Main Events were good ideas at all and the crowd s*** on all of them. Didn't stop Vince from shoveling s*** into fans mouths week after week. 

It'll happen, we'll all hate it, the trolls will love it, and hopefully people continue to stop watching. Eventually only the trolls will be tuning into to Raw.


Lol at people who have a different opinion than you being trolls. So cool.

The 'deal with it' crowd are definitely trolls.
lolAmerica
Reigns/Cena should be the Wrestlemania main event and not thrown away with four weeks build up on a B-show. It deserves the majesty of Wrestlemania and I think it's a match that would add to the legend of Wrestlemania.
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?


Yes, the people in the crowd popping for Braun are smarks.

Do you think casuals are the ones singing along to NXT guys entrance themes, too? Casual fans didn't know who the f*** Shinsuke Nakamura was until he arrived on Smackdown.

Braun didn't get a reaction in the first year he was on the Raw. They grew his character on TV and he slowly won the fans over. Acting like that didn't happen is just stupid.


If by grow you mean speak and saying "meme-worthy" stuff, then yes he has. Not to mention, this is also due to being paired with Roman. This happens with anyone else (example: Zayn) in Roman's spot and the smarks will bash Braun like he was Sheamus
JUS FC: 4854-3681-3756 (Kayin12)
PSN: BahamutKnight0
The "Cash in" made the last Brock-Roman match, I can't see a rematch being nowhere near as memorable as the last one.
MUFC- The Religion.
Miami Dolphins: Blissfully succumb to the whirling blackness of eternal oblivion
ClayGuida 1 day ago#19
Bahamut knight zero posted...
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
DeathX2270 posted...
SmashBurb posted...
Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?


Yes, the people in the crowd popping for Braun are smarks.

Do you think casuals are the ones singing along to NXT guys entrance themes, too? Casual fans didn't know who the f*** Shinsuke Nakamura was until he arrived on Smackdown.

Braun didn't get a reaction in the first year he was on the Raw. They grew his character on TV and he slowly won the fans over. Acting like that didn't happen is just stupid.


If by grow you mean speak and saying "meme-worthy" stuff, then yes he has. Not to mention, this is also due to being paired with Roman. This happens with anyone else (example: Zayn) in Roman's spot and the smarks will bash Braun like he was Sheamus

Meme worthy stuff like 'tater tots' and 'suckatash'
lolAmerica
The crowd would boo the heck out of the Rumble, Brock would be mega face at WM, they'll be quiet for most the match, then boo as Reigns wins, and Vince and wrestling insiders who want to be cool will say "look, they're booing! Reigns is OVER! If you buy a ticket to boo Roman Reigns, he's a draw, even though no one's really buying a ticket to boo Roman Reigns and they're just booing from sheer boredom after coming to see AJ Styles, John Cena, the Horsewomen and/or Lesnar!"
Argument winners: calm down, troll, hater, you obviously, LOL, don't care, I'm done, actually this is funny, not wasting my time, butthurt, blocked, keep trying
It would be incredibly impressive if he carries on his streak of each WM main event being 1.5-2 stars worse than the one before. I didn't think he could do much worse than the HHH one, and then Taker happened. We could witness a match so bad it raises an army of the dead.
FinnBalor 1 day ago#22
It's because they made Reigns wrestle an old man and then an even older man at the next Mania.
Let's hope they don't just have Roman kick out of an indefinite number of finishers like they did last time. That really brought the match to a halt.
Dean Ambrose and Daniel Bryan both had good matches against one of those old men, and I'd put money on at least a half dozen guys being able to pull a non-trainwreck out of Taker, if not an actual decent match.
ninjabay 1 day ago#25
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw
it rained the day i was born but i was the lightning on that storm
another roman main event would be too much for me, havent watched since the brand split and have only seen MITB and summerslam...not gonna watch til RR and if its shaping up to another Roman main even i am gonna say i've officially outgrew this product
You feast on red herring because it is your birthright.
ClayGuida 1 day ago#27
FinnBalor posted...
It's because they made Reigns wrestle an old man and then an even older man at the next Mania.

It's not like hhh is a cripple.
lolAmerica
Braun is one of the most over guys in the WWE.

Nobody is denying Reigns playing a huge part in getting him there. But he's at a point where he gets massive pops even when he's not killing Reigns.
"The Lord is my rock and my fortress and my deliverer." (Psalm 18:2 - ESV)
Please tell me why anyone would think Brock Roman 2 would be anything better than what we already saw?
ssjmole 1 day ago#30
KBGiantsfan posted...
Please tell me why anyone would think Brock Roman 2 would be anything better than what we already saw?


Because their 1 on 1s keep getting interrupted we want a definitive ending
Signature, What's that?
mrlowrider 1 day ago#31
@KBGiantsfan the first one was awesome

People wanted more Owens/AJ no matter how lame their matches were
Secretary to the B0$$
http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
I've been enjoying the Owens/Styles feud very much.
If you feed them, they'll continue. It's that simple.
Why do you continue to watch something that you don't like weekly? I don't get it.
XIII_rocks 1 day ago#33
Roman/Brock 1 was great

They'd need to do something different now though because that style of Brock match has become kind of passè. But this was only Lesnar's third match after the decimation of Cena, and one of those was a triple threat, so it was still new and fun and they hit each other so f***ing hard. And Lesnar started dripping blood. And there was the whole Reigns smiling thing which added a lot, his really athletic comeback (which I know was just spears and punches but it worked)...it was a legitimately really fun match even before the cash-in. That said, the cash-in did make it more memorable. 

(Why are people responding to Burb posts?)
Such a lust for revenge
ssjmole posted...
KBGiantsfan posted...
Please tell me why anyone would think Brock Roman 2 would be anything better than what we already saw?


Because their 1 on 1s keep getting interrupted we want a definitive ending

So you think another massively booed and rejected Roman world title win is a good thing?
mrlowrider posted...
@KBGiantsfan the first one was awesome

People wanted more Owens/AJ no matter how lame their matches were

Yeah it was entertaining but Roman beating Brock when we all know Brock would kill him in a real fight is lame to me.
mrlowrider 1 day ago#37
KBGiantsfan posted...
mrlowrider posted...
@KBGiantsfan the first one was awesome

People wanted more Owens/AJ no matter how lame their matches were

Yeah it was entertaining but Roman beating Brock when we all know Brock would kill him in a real fight is lame to me.

brock would kill anyone in wwe in a real fight

so brock should never lose?
Secretary to the B0$$
http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
Xxlv20xX 1 day ago#38
ninjabay posted...
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw


The HHH wasn't that bad a match in a vacuum. Nothing great but a fairly typical hhh match. It's have been great as a middle card attraction match like the one with seth. It's that it was at the end of 7 hour grind that did it in and in combination of it being a story that was dragged out about two months longer than it needed to be. Honestly they probably should have done Brock vs Roman II then but oh well.
ssjmole 1 day ago#39
KBGiantsfan posted...
ssjmole posted...
KBGiantsfan posted...
Please tell me why anyone would think Brock Roman 2 would be anything better than what we already saw?


Because their 1 on 1s keep getting interrupted we want a definitive ending

So you think another massively booed and rejected Roman world title win is a good thing?


No but it's inevitable my point was just him Vs Brock is not a bad match to see
Signature, What's that?
mrlowrider 1 day ago#40
Xxlv20xX posted...
ninjabay posted...
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw


The HHH wasn't that bad a match in a vacuum. Nothing great but a fairly typical hhh match. It's have been great as a middle card attraction match like the one with seth. It's that it was at the end of 7 hour grind that did it in and in combination of it being a story that was dragged out about two months longer than it needed to be. Honestly they probably should have done Brock vs Roman II then but oh well.

tbh hhh/seth was f***ing awful too
Secretary to the B0$$
http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
ninjabay posted...
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw


Cause HHH is obsessed with the plodding 30 minute, old-school, heel-dominated matches where the popular face makes a comeback. When he varies away from those matches, his matches are usually fine to good. He's a mark for those matches, especially at Mania.
Roman should squash Cena, but lose to Lesnar at Mania.

If Reigns beats Lesnar, should be due to a swerve from Heyman.
Currently: Super Sm4sh Bros, Legend of Zelda BotW/ALBW, Pokemon Sun, Pooch & Yoshi's Wooly World, Bomberman R, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, MHOmega, WWE 2K17
jjonc2003 1 day ago#43
DarkDragon386 posted...
ninjabay posted...
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw


Cause HHH is obsessed with the plodding 30 minute, old-school, heel-dominated matches where the popular face makes a comeback. When he varies away from those matches, his matches are usually fine to good. He's a mark for those matches, especially at Mania.


HHH had a great match vs. Bryan at WM30. It's just he has terrible matchups against people that are equal to his size so he can't play the traditional heel vs. comeback face match that he works great in.
GT: All American619
San Diego State Aztecs Football Season Tickets holder since 2012
The_Dragon_Died posted...
Yeah the first match was such a dud. Not what you'd want in a freaking WrestleMania main event.

The first match wasn't a dud at all. Reigns vs hhh was the dud. Because people didn't want hhh nor reigns as champ.
Look In my Eyes! What do ya see!!
Pokemon Y FC Robin 0920-0595-5864
TC is right though not about Brock/Strowman but Cena vs Roman is big money and Wrestlemania worthy match. Brock's best matches are behind him (take a look at the Brock vs HHH feud, more than just Suplex City)
What you looking at?
As long as Brock's on his suplex shtick, his best matches are far, far behind him.
If you feed them, they'll continue. It's that simple.
Why do you continue to watch something that you don't like weekly? I don't get it.
XIII_rocks 1 day ago#47
DarkDragon386 posted...
ninjabay posted...
I won't blame him for the Taker match but HHH had an amazing match agains Ambrose mere weeks before WM at FL. Even Ziggler had one on Raw


Cause HHH is obsessed with the plodding 30 minute, old-school, heel-dominated matches where the popular face makes a comeback. When he varies away from those matches, his matches are usually fine to good. He's a mark for those matches, especially at Mania.


That's true

The match with Rollins was tailor-made for classic HHH. Work the body part, dominate the match. I liked it, but it plodded along at times.
Such a lust for revenge
The_Dragon_Died posted...
As long as Brock's on his suplex shtick, his best matches are far, far behind him.


Brock doesn't need to do anything extra to put on good matches.
The Co-Official D.Va of every GameFAQs board!
"Think you can keep up with me? I play to win!"
BazzaPersonal posted...
The_Dragon_Died posted...
As long as Brock's on his suplex shtick, his best matches are far, far behind him.


Brock doesn't need to do anything extra to put on good matches.


We'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
If you feed them, they'll continue. It's that simple.
Why do you continue to watch something that you don't like weekly? I don't get it.
  1. Boards
  2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
  3. I don't see how Roman/Brock at WM34 is a good idea at all
    1. Boards
    2. Pro Wrestling: WWE
    3. I don't see how Roman/Brock at WM34 is a good idea at all
    ReignFury 1 day ago#51
    bigpatpunchhard posted...
    Reigns/Cena should be the Wrestlemania main event and not thrown away with four weeks build up on a B-show. It deserves the majesty of Wrestlemania and I think it's a match that would add to the legend of Wrestlemania.


    Agreed, also the Lesnar torch should be passed to Braun.
    Not all women deserve chivalry
    http://i.giftrunk.com/rv4b2c.gif
    Ivany2008 1 day ago#52
    to be fair, it should be either Braun or Joe that faces Taker at WM34. Throw Reigns in a shield reunion to face Sanity.
    mrlowrider 1 day ago#53
    Ivany2008 posted...
    to be fair, it should be either Braun or Joe that faces Taker at WM34. Throw Reigns in a shield reunion to face Sanity.

    Imagine wasting any of the shield on those jabronis, let alone all three
    Secretary to the B0$$
    http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
    Ivany2008 1 day ago#54
    mrlowrider posted...
    Ivany2008 posted...
    to be fair, it should be either Braun or Joe that faces Taker at WM34. Throw Reigns in a shield reunion to face Sanity.

    Imagine wasting any of the shield on those jabronis, let alone all three


    Its a better decision than anything WWE will have either of those 3 guys do.
    Brock vs Roman at mania will draw huge. Look at how well Wrestlemania 31 did. You guys worry too much.
    I am Ruthless Aggression.
    mrlowrider 1 day ago#56
    Sanity ever making the main roster would be a mistake, let alone making WrestleMania in any capacity
    Secretary to the B0$$
    http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
    KobeSystem 1 day ago#57
    I am 100% sure Braun was made with "IM NOT FINISHED WITH YOU"
    Ivany2008 1 day ago#58
    and yet they are still as over as the shield were when they were down in nxt.
    mrlowrider 1 day ago#59
    Ivany2008 posted...
    and yet they are still as over as the shield were when they were down in nxt.

    i'm not sure why you're making this comparison for multiple reasons but
    Secretary to the B0$$
    http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
    Ivany2008 1 day ago#60
    mrlowrider posted...
    Ivany2008 posted...
    and yet they are still as over as the shield were when they were down in nxt.

    i'm not sure why you're making this comparison for multiple reasons but


    because I would rather see that match up, than Brock Lesnars match be wasted on a guy like Reigns whose not getting over despite all attempts to make him so. Ambrose and Rollins were always the guys to watch out for in the Shield, and Reigns wasn't even supposed to be in the Shield, it was supposed to be Kassius Ohno.
    The_Dragon_Died posted...
    BazzaPersonal posted...
    The_Dragon_Died posted...
    As long as Brock's on his suplex shtick, his best matches are far, far behind him.


    Brock doesn't need to do anything extra to put on good matches.


    We'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

    Good thing the majority of people don't agree with you. In fact look and see which match is booed more at mania. Roman vs hhh or vs Brock. Roman taker match is worse than brocks by far.
    Look In my Eyes! What do ya see!!
    Pokemon Y FC Robin 0920-0595-5864
    streamofthesky posted...
    The worst part of the plan to me is, Lesnar holding the title for an entire f***ing year. >_<
    Just give it to Roman now. Get it the f*** over with. I don't even care anymore. Just get it off Lesnar for f*** sakes!


    So you want the title on Roman for a whole year and possibly more than an year instead?

    Putting a no-prestige title like Universal Title on Lesnar and keeping the title on him for a long time is actually what WWE needed, they needed that to bring prestige to that title and the right time to take the title off Lesnar is WM 34, no sooner and no later.
    And that, kids, is how I met your mother ^^
    Ransom_Stark posted...
    streamofthesky posted...
    The worst part of the plan to me is, Lesnar holding the title for an entire f***ing year. >_<
    Just give it to Roman now. Get it the f*** over with. I don't even care anymore. Just get it off Lesnar for f*** sakes!


    So you want the title on Roman for a whole year and possibly more than an year instead?

    Putting a no-prestige title like Universal Title on Lesnar and keeping the title on him for a long time is actually what WWE needed, they needed that to bring prestige to that title and the right time to take the title off Lesnar is WM 34, no sooner and no later.

    "You don't want to jump in a volcano? So what, you think going into space without a space suit is so much better?"

    Why's it have to be one of two s*** options, and nothing else? Seriously, wtf?
    Put the title on someone actually good. Have him treat having the title as an honor and something he'll fight to his last to keep. Book a bunch of exciting title defense matches and after a decent reign, give the rub to another guy and keep at it.

    Just because Roman beats Brock for the title doesn't mean he...or anyone...has to hold it for an entire f***ing year, either. He can get a few months with it so he doesn't get Sasha'd, then hand it off to a better wrestler. Ideally he doesn't have it at all, but WWE is set on it, so whatever. Even if Roman was holding it for a year, it'd be an improvement over Brock holding it for a year...it'd actually be defended frequently.
    seth didnt need to save it TC. The match was fine and hype and they were doing ok, it was just the fans drinking hatred on the typical anti roman train who wanted no part of it and treated it like it was a terrible matchup
    "Why do you hesitate to extend the power of Macedon - your power"-Alexander The Great \_O__/ >>>> l__O__l "YES"."YES"
    KBGiantsfan posted...
    ssjmole posted...
    KBGiantsfan posted...
    Please tell me why anyone would think Brock Roman 2 would be anything better than what we already saw?


    Because their 1 on 1s keep getting interrupted we want a definitive ending

    So you think another massively booed and rejected Roman world title win is a good thing?

    why not, didnt stop people watching the shows or ppv or buying tickets let alone post a million tickets on forums. it creates reactions. if anything ppl will tune in to see who gets it off him next as they always do. no one should deny this
    "Why do you hesitate to extend the power of Macedon - your power"-Alexander The Great \_O__/ >>>> l__O__l "YES"."YES"
    Tris10 1 day ago#66
    The original match at WM 31 wasn't THAT bad. I was happy that Seth cashed in though.
    Not a MASSIVE fan of Roman. He can put on fairly decent matches with better workers (John Cena lite) but his push and booking really hurt the guy. I do actually think Vince should step down after failing to see beyond the dollar signs that his whole Roman experiment is a bust after several years.
    He doesn't NEED to make another face of the company, as many people have stated on this board many times, no one has the ability to be an actual draw, it's the brand that does it.
    Roman (like so many before him) isn't a DRAW, which puzzles me as to why his push keeps going.
    Dean was given like two months (if that) to be "the guy". Reigns gets years? 

    Also Braun is pretty good. But in two years he'll be a nobody. Guys his size just aren't viable for a sustained push. Especially if Lesnar does have a dominant year with the UC, you can't have Braun have another lengthy reign back to back.
    Switch him face? Sure. But who's gonna buy a face who's NEVER an underdog and can steamroll the whole roster? 
    He's basically screwed......
    It drops deep as it does in my breath/
    I never sleep, cus sleep is the cousin of death.....
    People need to stop with all the Roman hate. Has it not sunk in yet that no matter how you boo or throw a tantrum & act like kids that the WWE will still push him & make him the face? The sooner you guys except it the better. Roman has the look, build & skill to be at the top. He actually looks like a world champion unlike some like Balor who've had the title. Lesner vs Reigns will be a fine WM match & no matter who wins we'll have a champ who looks like he deserves the belt. Also Roman sells a lot of merch so that's another reason why they push him, you push the ones that actually bring in money.
    (edited 1 day ago)reportquote
    XIII_rocks 1 day ago#68
    Tris10 posted...
    The original match at WM 31 wasn't THAT bad.


    Why are people needing to be apologists for this match or whatever? It's not a match that needs to be "defended", it doesn't need people to say "man it was ok". It was legitimately really, really good.
    Such a lust for revenge
    MRW1215 1 day ago#69
    assassinonetwo posted...
    People need to stop with all the Roman hate. Has it not sunk in yet that no matter how you boo or throw a tantrum & act like kids that the WWE will still push him & make him the face? The sooner you guys except it the better.


    That's kind of weak, though. Yes, we all know Roman is getting pushed no matter what, but if people just "roll over and die", they basically become WWE's "b****", and no one wants that. WWE might not care what its audience wants, but the audience shouldn't just give up.

    I dunno, I, myself, don't hate or even dislike Roman, but I dislike the prospect of him getting the Cena push, and it's frustrating that they've already penned in him headlining yet another WM, and getting yet another "crowning moment" that pretty much nobody wants him to get. The "forced top guy" schtick got old fast with Cena, and now we're just sliding in to doing it with Roman? Hell, it seems like they're even trying to rack up his accolades at a quicker pace than Cena's. Where does it end?
    https://www.youtube.com/RatedM477
    New videos every weekday at 4PM ET!
    Tris10 1 day ago#70
    If Roman beats Lesnar next year he becomes the first man to win three consecutive one on one WM main events (going last) in WWE history.
    Hogan can be argued as three (WM 7,8 & 9) on a technicality. 7 he won clean. 8 he won on a DQ and 9 he wasn't even advertised, but won the main event.
    But Roman would be the the first to win decisively and advertised.
    Just remember that greats such as the Rock, Bret Hart & HBK have only ever won a WM main event ONCE. 

    This is all off the top while I'm at work, no research, so I may have fumbled a win or two lol.
    It drops deep as it does in my breath/
    I never sleep, cus sleep is the cousin of death.....
    mrlowrider 1 day ago#71
    yeah that's right, but Hogan won 3 straight, just WM 1 was a tag match. He also won 6 of the first 8, plus 9 depending on your perspective. He also stood tall at the end of WM 4.

    Kind of shocking Cena never did it. Austin likely would have but for his injuries, frankly would have likely had 4.

    I like Roman, but considering they're blowing the Cena match at No Mercy, why wait for Mania for the brock match? They should try and elevate another young star as his opponent.
    Secretary to the B0$$
    http://i.imgur.com/jrvFxBS.gif
    DeathX2270 posted...
    SmashBurb posted...
    DeathX2270 posted...
    SmashBurb posted...
    Braun's popularity comes entirely by the fact that the IWC hates Reigns.

    So the live crowd that pops for Braun is the IWC?


    Yes, the people in the crowd popping for Braun are smarks.

    Do you think casuals are the ones singing along to NXT guys entrance themes, too? Casual fans didn't know who the f*** Shinsuke Nakamura was until he arrived on Smackdown.

    Braun didn't get a reaction in the first year he was on the Raw. They grew his character on TV and he slowly won the fans over. Acting like that didn't happen is just stupid.



    Roman Reigns put Braun over and made him a star. PERIOD. Roman got MULTIPLE quality matches out of him and took spots from him that no other wrestler has. Besides Big Show no other wrestler has really even gotten 3stars from Braun because no one else could sell Brauns offense for long stretches then realistically make a hot run. 

    90% of both rosters can do nothing but be squashed by Braun/Brock and you don't want the one guy who works well with anyone in the main event?

    Reigns has turned into one of the most consistent workers in the WWE. Couple that with his ability to represent the brand to the media, merchandise sales and his pretty safe style and why the hell NOT put the strap on him? Hell, he even can work face or heel so he can run a program with ANYONE.
    Do I have to give you THE BUSINESS?
    1. Boards
    2. Pro Wrestling: WWE 
    3. I don't see how Roman/Brock at WM34 is a good idea at all

No comments:

Post a Comment